Archive
2020, Volume 9
2019, Volume 8
2018, Volume 7
2017, Volume 6
2016, Volume 5
2015, Volume 4
2014, Volume 3
2013, Volume 2
2012, Volume 1




Volume 5, Issue 5, September 2016, Page: 142-145
A Theory on the Birth, Structure and Ultimate Fate of the Universe
Hitoshi Shibata, Taiko Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
Norio Ogata, Rearch Institute, Taiko Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seikacho, Japan
Received: Aug. 7, 2016;       Accepted: Aug. 26, 2016;       Published: Sep. 13, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20160505.14      View  3778      Downloads  120
Abstract
One major theory stipulates that our Universe was born through a process of fluctuation in a quantum world, the Big Bang and inflation, and is still expanding. However, questions concerning dark energy, dark matter and other major issue remain unanswered. If it is assumed that the quantum world remains outside of the Universe in the same state as before the birth of the Universe, and that the Universe is a space-time bubble created therein with a boundary that is an event horizon similar to a black hole, then it can be proven that the Universe is not expanding but contracting from its boundary, while satisfactorily explaining the observed results of the Universe’s expansion and isotropy. The authors propose this as a new theory.
Keywords
Universe, Big Bang, Inflation, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Black Hole, Quandom, Cosmic Microwave Background
To cite this article
Hitoshi Shibata, Norio Ogata, A Theory on the Birth, Structure and Ultimate Fate of the Universe, American Journal of Modern Physics. Vol. 5, No. 5, 2016, pp. 142-145. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20160505.14
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
E. Hubble, “A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 15, pp. 168-173, 1929.
[2]
K. Kamada, “Inflationary cosmology and the standard model Higgs with a small Hubble-induced mass,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 742, pp. 126-135, 2015.
[3]
B. P. Schmidt, R. P. Kirshner, and R. G. Eastman, “Expanding photospheres of type II supernovae and the extragalactic distance scale,” Astrophys. J., vol. 395, pp. 366-386, 1992.
[4]
A. Addazi, S. Capozziello, S. Odintsov, “Born-lnfeld condensate as a possible origin of neutrino masses and dark energy,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 760, pp. 611-616, 2016.
[5]
D. Comelli, M. Pietroni, and A. Riotto, “Dark energy and dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 571, pp. 115-120, 2003.
[6]
K. Nozari, N. Behrouz, “An interacting dark energy model with nonminimal derivative coupling,” Phys. Dark Universe, vol. 13, pp. 92-110, 2016.
[7]
K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, “Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests,” Astrophys. Space Sci., vol. 342, pp. 155-228, 2012.
[8]
P.-H. Chavanis, “The logotropic dark fluid as a unification of dark matter and dark energy,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 758, pp. 59-66, 2016.
[9]
C. M. Ho, and S. D. H. Hsu, “Astrophysical constraints on dark energy,” Astroparticle Phys, vol. 74, pp. 47-50, 2016.
[10]
C. G. Tsagas, “Peculiar motions, accelerated expansion, and the cosmological axis,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 84, pp. 063503, 2011.
[11]
A. Shafieloo, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Is cosmic acceleration slowing down?” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 80, pp. 101301 (R), 2009.
Browse journals by subject